Embedding Design-Driven Innovation in Local Government: A Case Study on the City of Carlsbad, California USA

INTRODUCTION

In an era of declining public trust and increasingly complex societal challenges, the City of Carlsbad, California, presents a compelling model for how design innovation, data, and economic development can converge to build more responsive, resilient, and inclusive local governance.

This case study is part of the Democratizing Design broader project, a collaborative initiative led by the UC San Diego Design Lab, in partnership with The Design Academy, Inc. and CETYS University. Democratizing Design is a mindset and practice that makes design understandable, accessible, and inclusive—shaped through meaningful community participation.The initiative seeks to integrate design into public policy to elevate community well-being, foster economic growth, build creative problem-solving skills through education, and strengthen the design sector itself. 

Grounded in Don Norman’s framework of Humanity-Centered Design, which emphasizes a people-centered approach, this methodology involves collaborative efforts that engage citizens, systematic analysis, and co-design of simple, small interventions that facilitate incremental progress.

Focusing on the civic sector, this case study examines how human-centered design innovation can inform and transform public policy and systems to improve quality of life. By tracing Carlsbad’s multi-year journey—from conventional municipal management to national recognition for digital innovation and community engagement—we distill key strategies and lessons for policymakers, civic technologists, and educators working to modernize government from within. 

While systems, structures, and technology all played important roles, Carlsbad’s most enduring achievement was a shift in mindset: Human-Centered Design–driven innovation was no longer a special initiative— over 5 years it became embedded in how the city worked. This evolution reflects the core of democratized design: making innovation participatory, practical, and built to last.

This case study offers a powerful reminder: when human-centered design becomes part of a government’s DNA, it outlasts departments, job titles, and political cycles. Today, that cultural shift is at a crossroads. With the formal Innovation & Technology Department phased out, Carlsbad must now decide whether to continue investing in the intentional practice of design and innovation—or risk letting hard-won progress erode. A legacy of mindset change though may be Carlsbad’s greatest innovation of all.

STRATEGIC RESPONSE

IMPACT OF DESIGN-DRIVEN INNOVATION

Lessons Learned

CONCLUSION: looking ahead

Today, Carlsbad stands at a crossroads. With the formal Innovation & Technology department phased out, the city faces a pivotal moment: will it continue to evolve as a design-driven, data-informed government, or risk losing momentum without dedicated innovation infrastructure?

The influence of past innovation efforts is still visible—from procurement to planning, Carlsbad now reflects a more strategic, human-centered approach to governance. As one city leader put it, “Innovation isn’t a department. It’s how we work now.”

Yet we must recognize that meaningful innovation doesn’t sustain itself by accident. It requires intentionality and investment in professional expertise, continuous education, and the time to build trust—both within government and with the communities it serves. Carlsbad’s success stemmed not only from adopting data and technology, but from embracing inclusive, collaborative processes rooted in human-centered design.

This case study serves as a reminder that democratizing design—making design accessible, understandable, and embedded in civic life—is not just a theory. In Carlsbad, it became a lived practice. By embedding design into policy, infrastructure, and community engagement, the city created the conditions for shared problem-solving and collective ownership of civic change.

Carlsbad’s journey shows what’s possible when design driven innovation is not reserved for specialists but embraced as a shared civic capacity. That is the true promise of democratizing design—and the legacy this city now has the opportunity to sustain and scale.

Credits

Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process

This publication was developed using a combination of human-led research and AI-assisted tools. Author Joan Gregor employed generative AI technologies to support analysis, synthesis, and refinement of content—particularly in organizing categories and surfacing themes from interview transcripts and secondary research.

Prior to engaging AI tools, Joan Gregor and the Democratizing Design team conducted a human-led review of all interviews and relevant contextual research. The generative AI tools were then used interactively—guided by carefully constructed prompts and reviewed iteratively to ensure accuracy, clarity, and alignment with the project’s goals. All outputs generated by AI were reviewed, edited, and restructured by the author.

Democratizing Design Team members participating in the case study

Joan Gregor Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Analysis, Supervision, Writing review & editing 

Diana Robinson Trapaga Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing review & editing

Michèle Morris Conceptualization, Investigation, Resources, Funding acquisition, Review

Michelle Woodhouse Conceptualization, Writing review & editing

Elaine Martel  Data Curation, Investigation 

David Graham Conceptualization, Investigation, Supervision

Elysia Mac Project administration

Zach Johnson Resources, Visualization

Camille Van Bruaene, Investigation

Cole Biehle  Investigation

Oliva Gale Writing review & editing

Final editorial oversight and content review were conducted by Joan Gregor, Diana Robinson Trápaga, Michelle Woodhouse, and Michelle Morris, who take full responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of the published work.