
Embedding Design-Driven Innovation in Local Government: A Case Study on Ensenada, Mexico
INTRODUCTION
In the context of growing urban complexity and cross-border interdependence, the City of Ensenada, Baja California—designated a UNESCO Creative City of Gastronomy in 2015—offers a compelling example of how cultural identity, citizen participation, and design thinking can begin to shape more inclusive civic systems. This case study is part of the Democratizing Design initiative, a cross-border collaboration between UC San Diego Design Lab, The Design Academy, and CETYS University.
Democratizing Design is a people-centered practice and mindset that makes design more understandable, accessible, and inclusive—shaped through community participation and grounded in values of belonging, equity, and shared power. The broader initiative seeks to embed design as a public sector tool to elevate community well-being, foster economic opportunity, and strengthen the design ecosystem across the San Diego-Tijuana mega region.
Focusing on Ensenada’s civic sector, this case study explores how design-driven innovation—sometimes explicit, sometimes implicit—can enable more responsive and humane public systems. Through interviews with civic leaders and community actors, we trace how ideas around infrastructure, participation, legal frameworks, and aesthetics are shaping the city’s design culture and its future.
-
In the context of growing urban complexity and cross-border interdependence, the City of Ensenada, Baja California—designated a UNESCO Creative City of Gastronomy in 2015—offers a compelling example of how cultural identity, citizen participation, and design thinking can begin to shape more inclusive civic systems. This case study is part of the Democratizing Design initiative, a cross-border collaboration between UC San Diego Design Lab, The Design Academy, and CETYS University.
Democratizing Design is a people-centered practice and mindset that makes design more understandable, accessible, and inclusive—shaped through community participation and grounded in values of belonging, equity, and shared power. The broader initiative seeks to embed design as a public sector tool to elevate community well-being, foster economic opportunity, and strengthen the design ecosystem across the San Diego-Tijuana mega region.
Focusing on Ensenada’s civic sector, this case study explores how design-driven innovation—sometimes explicit, sometimes implicit—can enable more responsive and humane public systems. Through interviews with civic leaders and community actors, we trace how ideas around infrastructure, participation, legal frameworks, and aesthetics are shaping the city’s design culture and its future.
-
Ensenada is a mid-sized coastal city with a vibrant identity shaped by its port, cultural heritage, and growing creative economy. In 2015, it was designated a UNESCO Creative City of Gastronomy, a milestone that elevated civic pride and cultural visibility. This designation also catalyzed a new wave of community-led initiatives that used creativity not just as celebration, but as civic infrastructure.
Despite this momentum, the city continues to face major constraints: overlapping jurisdictional authority, tight budgets, and high staff turnover in local government. These conditions often stall large-scale reform. Yet, within this complexity, design-driven innovation has quietly taken root.
Architecture professionals—many of whom now serve in government roles—bring multidimensional perspectives. One municipal architect, for example, notes her career spans the real estate corridor between San Diego and Ensenada, where urban development is inseparable from cross-border flows of people, goods, and culture. This regional dynamic, she explains, “creates a very strong bond” in areas like tourism and logistics.
A local designer with degrees in humanitarian and sustainable design described Ensenada as both a professional canvas and a personal cause. He launched a participatory urban revitalization effort that evolved into the formal proposal to designate Ensenada as a UNESCO Creative City in 2015. "It was easy to speak well of my city," he shared, citing strong local networks and an intuitive understanding of design language and community identity.
-
Though Ensenada lacks a formal innovation office, several leaders are internalizing design-like mindsets. A director of municipal infrastructure recalls joining the government to understand why projects often fail. He discovered bureaucratic and legal roadblocks that inhibit even the most urgent public works: “You cannot invest in a park if the land doesn’t have legal certainty.”
But his perspective shifted further when he saw how infrastructure improvements changed not just physical spaces but social dynamics. “When we improve a street, suddenly businesses start painting their facades, people picks up garbage. The environment transforms the behavior.” This unspoken ripple effect mirrors one of the core outcomes of human-centered design: changing systems by focusing on people’s everyday experiences.
Similar reflections came from a government administrator who emphasized that many projects begin with community listening. “It’s not just about building; it’s about understanding what people need, especially those who haven’t been included in the process before.”
DESIGN-DRIVEN INNOVATION IMPACT
-
The designation of Ensenada as a UNESCO Creative City was not just symbolic—it was rooted in a participatory design process. One civic innovator described how his design lab hosted creative missions, inviting architects and designers from in the region to co-create public space concepts. These projects catalyzed a sense of collective imagination and civic pride.
A disability rights advocate and former government advisor underscored that culture cannot be divorced from equity. “The urban design of our cities determines who is included and who is not. When I entered transnational companies in Tijuana, everything was accessible. But walk outside, and it’s a different world.” He advocates for universal design not just as policy, but as principle.
-
Ensenada’s civic leaders widely embrace citizen participation—not merely as consultation, but as a mechanism for relevance and adoption. One municipal architect explains: “The city belongs to everyone. If we don’t involve people in the process, projects won’t work.”
Despite structural limitations, interviewees described moments where participation was transformative: co-designing parks, redirecting budgets based on feedback, or opening public spaces to events that reflect local culture.
-
Perhaps the clearest arena where human-centered principles emerge is in infrastructure development. A director of municipal infrastructure offers a powerful example: “People are throwing wastewater in the street. Fixing that isn’t just engineering. It’s a matter of public trust, of living with dignity.”
A city planner emphasized that every design choice carries symbolic weight: “A sidewalk isn’t just for walking. It shows who the city is designed for.”
The disability rights advocate echoed this, stating, “Public space must reflect public values. If it’s inaccessible, the message is that some people matter less.”
-
Alongside these design practices, a citizen-led effort has been working with Ensenada´s Economic Advisory Council, to shape Ensenada’s future as a Smart City. The goal is to use technology and innovation not only to boost efficiency, but to create a city that is sustainable, inclusive, and centered on people’s everyday lives.
The Smart City plan, developed through consultations and community input, focuses on six areas: economy, mobility, sustainability, quality of life, society, and governance. As one participant put it, the plan responds to “a need that’s been voiced by citizens,” especially regarding mobility and access.
A key initiative is the Comprehensive Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (PIMUS), which rethinks how people move through the city—prioritizing walkability and equitable access to public space. “We’ve abandoned our center,” one contributor reflected, highlighting the urgency of reconnecting neighborhoods and revitalizing civic life. Supported by state and federal programs, the smart city strategy aligns with Mexico’s broader development plans, giving Ensenada a platform to push innovation at scale.
lessons learned
-
Many civic leaders are using design thinking—empathizing, co-creating, iterating—even if they don’t formally call it “design.” This suggests a need to connect language with practice to build internal alignment.
-
Many impactful design initiatives depend on passionate individuals, not permanent structures. Institutionalizing these practices will require policy change and funding stability.
-
The fragmentation between municipal and state responsibilities makes it difficult to deliver seamless services. Shared governance models or pilot programs could bridge these divides.
-
Ensenada’s food, arts, and tourism sectors offer more than economic value—they are platforms for public engagement, youth development, and civic storytelling. Design strategies can amplify these effects.
-
Design is not just what’s built—it’s how it’s experienced. Streets, parks, and water systems carry messages about who belongs and what the city prioritizes. Inclusive design creates inclusive cities.
-
Professionals with experience in the San Diego-Ensenada corridor bring global insights to local practice. More structured collaboration could accelerate innovation.
-
Smart city goals in Ensenada complement the human-centered design movement already underway. Together, they offer a blueprint for building a city that listens, adapts, and grows with its people.

CONCLUSION: CROSS-BORDER INSIGHTS FOR DESIGNING BELONGING
Ensenada’s experience underscores a key truth: Even without formal innovation infrastructure, the principles of democratized design can thrive through local leadership, civic empathy, and small-scale interventions. Civic actors are using the tools of human-centered design—observation, participation, prototyping—to shift systems from within.
To sustain this momentum, what’s needed next is not just more design—but more shared ownership of the city’s future. Institutional support, cross-jurisdictional partnerships, and design-literate leadership can help translate these early wins into long-term transformation.
This case study sets the foundation for cross-border recommendations that can guide cities on both sides of the border to build inclusive, adaptive, and human-scale public systems.
REFERENCES
Plan estratégico municipal de Ensenada: PEME enfoque metropolitano, visión 2034. FIDEM.
Comité de Planeación para el Desarrollo Municipal. 2024. Copladem Ensenada.
Programa especial de impulso a las industrias creativas 2022-2027
Democratizing Design interviews with internal staff, internal partners and community leader (2024-2025)
Credits
Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process
During the preparation of this work, the author Diana Robinson Trápaga utilized the Value Architect (VA) GenAI-powered Voice of Customer analytics tool to review categories and analyses. Prior to using the VA tool, the author reviewed each interview and analyzed the information to categorize and code the data through a human-led process. ChatGPT was used to edit self-written text for clarity and brevity. The authors, Diana Robinson Trápaga, Joan Gregor, and Michelle Woodhouse, carefully reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the publication's content.
Democratizing Design Team members participating in the case study
Diana Robinson Trapaga Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing original draft, Writing review & editing
Michèle Morris Conceptualization, Funding acquisition
Joan Gregor Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing review & editing
Michelle Woodhouse Conceptualization, Writing review & editing
Elaine Martel Data Curation, Investigation
Jesse Rutherford Writing – review & editing
Elysia Mac Project administration
Pedro Poncelis Investigation
Lila Carrera Investigation
Frida Arceo Investigation
Dania Garcia Investigation
Phil Goddard Software
Final editorial oversight and content review were conducted by Joan Gregor, Michelle Woodhouse, and Michelle Morris, who take full responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of the published work.